Approaches to Demand Forecasting in Managerial Economics

All firms forecast demand, but it would be difficult to find any two firms that forecast demand in exactly the same way. Over the last few decades, many different forecasting techniques have been developed in a number of different application areas, including engineering and economics. Many such procedures have been applied to the practical problem of forecasting demand in a business  system, with varying degrees of success. Most commercial software packages that support demand forecasting in a business  system include dozens of different forecasting algorithms that the analyst can use to generate alternative demand forecasts.

Approaches to Demand Forecasting in Managerial Economics

While scores of different forecasting techniques exist, almost any forecasting procedure can be broadly classified into one of the following four basic categories based on the fundamental approach towards the forecasting problem that is employed by the technique.

  1. Judgmental Approaches. The essence of the judgmental approach is to address the forecasting issue by assuming that someone else knows and can tell you the right answer. That is, in a judgment-based technique we gather the knowledge and opinions of people who are in a position to know what demand will be. For example, we might conduct a survey of the customer base to estimate what our sales will be next month.
  2. Experimental Approaches. Another approach to demand forecasting, which is appealing when an item is “new” and when there is no other information upon which to base a forecast, is to conduct a demand experiment on a small group of customers and to extrapolate the results to a larger population. For example, firms will often test a new consumer product in a geographically isolated “test market” to establish its probable market share. This experience is then extrapolated to the national market to plan the new product launch. Experimental approaches are very useful and necessary for new products, but for existing products that have an accumulated historical demand record it seems intuitive that demand forecasts should somehow be based on this demand experience. For most firms (with some very notable exceptions) the large majority of SKUs in the product line have long demand histories.
  3. Relational/Causal Approaches. The assumption behind a causal or relational forecast is that, simply put, there is a reason why people buy our product. If we can understand what that reason (or set of reasons) is, we can use that understanding to develop a demand forecast. For example, if we sell umbrellas at a sidewalk stand, we would probably notice that daily demand is strongly correlated to the weather — we sell more umbrellas when it rains. Once we have established this relationship, a good weather forecast will help us order enough umbrellas to meet the expected demand.
  4. “Time Series” Approaches. A time series procedure is fundamentally different than the first three approaches we have discussed. In a pure time series technique, no judgment or expertise or opinion is sought. We do not look for “causes” or relationships or factors which somehow “drive” demand. We do not test items or experiment with customers. By their nature, time series procedures are applied to demand data that are longitudinal rather than cross-sectional. That is, the demand data represent experience that is repeated over time rather than across items or locations. The essence of the approach is to recognize (or assume) that demand occurs over time in patterns that repeat themselves, at least approximately. If we can describe these general patterns or tendencies, without regard to their “causes”, we can use this description to form the basis of a forecast.

In one sense, all forecasting procedures involve the analysis of historical experience into patterns and the projection of those patterns into the future in the belief that the future will somehow resemble the past. The differences in the four approaches are in the way this “search for pattern” is conducted. Judgmental approaches rely on the subjective, ad-hoc analyses of external individuals. Experimental tools extrapolate results from small numbers of customers to large populations. Causal methods search for reasons for demand. Time series techniques simply analyze the demand data themselves to identify temporal patterns that emerge and persist.

Judgmental Approaches to Forecasting

By their nature, judgment-based forecasts use subjective and qualitative data to  forecast future outcomes. They inherently rely on expert opinion, experience, judgment,  intuition, conjecture, and other “soft” data. Such techniques are often used when  historical data are not available, as is the case with the introduction of a new product or  service, and in forecasting the impact of fundamental changes such as new technologies,  environmental changes, cultural changes, legal changes, and so forth. Some of the more  common procedures include the following:

  1. Surveys. This is a “bottom up” approach where each individual contributes a piece  of what will become the final forecast. For example, we might poll or sample our customer  base to estimate demand for a coming period. Alternatively, we might gather estimates  from our sales force as to how much each salesperson expects to sell in the next time  period. The approach is at least plausible in the sense that we are asking people who are  in a position to know something about future demand. On the other hand, in practice  there have proven to be serious problems of bias associated with these tools. It can be  difficult and expensive to gather data from customers. History also shows that surveys of  “intention to purchase” will generally over-estimate actual demand — liking a product is one  thing, but actually buying it is often quite another. Sales people may also intentionally (or  even unintentionally) exaggerate or underestimate their sales forecasts based on what  they believe their supervisors want them to say. If the sales force (or the customer base)  believes that their forecasts will determine the level of finished goods inventory that will be  available in the next period, they may be sorely tempted to inflate their demand estimates  so as to insure good inventory availability. Even if these biases could be eliminated or  controlled, another serious problem would probably remain. Sales people might be able  to estimate their weekly dollar volume or total unit sales, but they are not likely to be able  to develop credible estimates at the SKU level that the business  will require.
  2. Consensus methods. As an alternative to the “bottom-up” survey approaches,  consensus methods use a small group of individuals to develop general forecasts. In a  “Jury of Executive Opinion”, for example, a group of executives in the firm would meet and  develop through debate and discussion a general forecast of demand. Each individual  would presumably contribute insight and understanding based on their view of the market,  the product, the competition, and so forth. Once again, while these executives are  undoubtedly experienced, they are hardly disinterested observers, and the opportunity for  biased inputs is obvious. A more formal consensus procedure, called “The Delphi  Method”, has been developed to help control these problems. In this technique, a panel of  disinterested technical experts is presented with a questionnaire regarding a forecast.  The answers are collected, processed, and re-distributed to the panel, making sure that all  information contributed by any panel member is available to all members, but on an  anonymous basis. Each expert reflects on the gathering opinion. A second questionnaire  is then distributed to the panel, and the process is repeated until a consensus forecast is  reached. Consensus methods are usually appropriate only for highly aggregate and  usually quite long-range forecasts.

Judgment-based methods are important in that they are often used to determine an  enterprise’s strategy. They are also used in more mundane decisions, such as  determining the quality of a potential vendor by asking for references, and there are many  other reasonable applications. It is true that judgment based techniques are an  inadequate basis for a demand forecasting system, but this should not be construed to  mean that judgment has no role to play in business  forecasting or that salespeople have no  knowledge to bring to the problem. In fact, it is often the case that sales and marketing  people have valuable information about sales promotions, new products, competitor  activity, and so forth, which should be incorporated into the forecast somehow. Many  organizations treat such data as additional information that is used to modify the existing  forecast rather than as the baseline data used to create the forecast in the first place.

Experimental Approaches to Forecasting

In the early stages of new product development it is important to get some estimate  of the level of potential demand for the product. A variety of market research techniques  are used to this end.

  1. Customer Surveys are sometimes conducted over the telephone or on street  corners, at shopping malls, and so forth. The new product is displayed or described, and  potential customers are asked whether they would be interested in purchasing the item.  While this approach can help to isolate attractive or unattractive product features,  experience has shown that “intent to purchase” as measured in this way is difficult to  translate into a meaningful demand forecast. This falls short of being a true “demand  experiment”.
  2. Consumer Panels are also used in the early phases of product development.  Here a small group of potential customers are brought together in a room where they can  use the product and discuss it among themselves. Panel members are often paid a  nominal amount for their participation. Like surveys, these procedures are more useful for  analyzing product attributes than for estimating demand, and they do not constitute true  “demand experiments” because no purchases take place.
  3. Test Marketing is often employed after new product development but prior to a  full-scale national launch of a new brand or product. The idea is to choose a relatively  small, reasonably isolated, yet somehow demographically “typical” market area.  The total  marketing plan for the item, including advertising, promotions, and distribution tactics, is  “rolled out” and implemented in the test market, and measurements of product awareness,  market penetration, and market share are made. While these data are used to estimate  potential sales to a larger national market, the emphasis here is usually on “fine-tuning”  the total marketing plan and insuring that no problems or potential embarrassments have  been overlooked.
  4. Scanner Panel Data procedures have recently been developed that permit  demand experimentation on existing brands and products. In these procedures, a large  set of household customers agrees to participate in an ongoing study of their grocery  buying habits. Panel members agree to submit information about the number of  individuals in the household, their ages, household income, and so forth. Whenever they  buy groceries at a supermarket participating in the research, their household identity is  captured along with the identity and price of every item they purchased. This is  straightforward due to the use of UPC codes and optical scanners at checkout. This  procedure results in a rich database of observed customer buying behavior. The analyst  is in a position to see each purchase in light of the full set of alternatives to the chosen  brand that were available in the store at the time of purchase, including all other brands,  prices, sizes, discounts, deals, coupon offers, and so on. Statistical models such as  discrete choice models can be used to analyze the relationships in the data. The  manufacturer and merchandiser are now in a position to test a price promotion and  estimate its probable effect on brand loyalty and brand switching behavior among  customers in general. This approach can develop valuable insight into demand behavior  at the customer level, but once again it can be difficult to extend this insight directly into  demand forecasts in the business system.

Relational/Causal Approaches to Forecasting

Suppose our firm operates retail stores in a dozen major cities, and we now decide  to open a new store in a city where we have not operated before. We will need to forecast  what the sales at the new store are likely to be. To do this, we could collect historical  sales data from all of our existing stores. For each of these stores we could also collect  relevant data related to the city’s population, average income, the number of competing  stores in the area, and other presumably relevant data. These additional data are all  referred to as explanatory variables or independent variables in the analysis. The sales  data for the stores are considered to be the dependent variable that we are trying to  explain or predict.

The basic premise is that if we can find relationships between the explanatory  variables (population, income, and so forth) and sales for the existing stores, then these  relationships will hold in the new city as well. Thus, by collecting data on the explanatory  variables in the target city and applying these relationships, sales in the new store can be  estimated. In some sense the posture here is that the explanatory variables “cause” the  sales. Mathematical and statistical procedures are used to develop and test these  explanatory relationships and to generate forecasts from them. Causal methods include  the following:

  1. Econometric models, such as discrete choice models and multiple regression. More elaborate systems involving sets of simultaneous regression equations can also be  attempted.
  2. Input-output models estimate the flow of goods between markets and industries.  These models ensure the integrity of the flows into and out of the modeled markets and  industries; they are used mainly in large-scale macro-economic analysis and were not  found useful in business applications.
  3. Life cycle models look at the various stages in a product’s “life” as it is launched,  matures, and phases out. These techniques examine the nature of the consumers who  buy the product at various stages (“early adopters,” “mainstream buyers,” “laggards,” etc.)  to help determine product life cycle trends in the demand pattern. Such models are used  extensively in industries such as high technology, fashion, and some consumer goods  facing short product life cycles. This class of model is not distinct from the others  mentioned here as the characteristics of the product life cycle can be estimated using, for  example, econometric models. They are mentioned here as a distinct class because the  overriding “cause” of demand with these models is assumed to be the life cycle stage the  product is in.
  4. Simulation models are used to model the flows of components into manufacturing  plants based on MRP schedules and the flow of finished goods throughout distribution  networks to meet customer demand. There is little theory to building such simulation  models. Their strength lies in their ability to account for many time lag effects and  complicated dependent demand schedules. They are, however, typically cumbersome and complicated.

Time Series Approaches to Forecasting

Although all four approaches are sometimes used to forecast demand, generally  the time-series approach is the most appropriate and the most accurate approach to  generate the large number of short-term, SKU level, locally dis-aggregated forecasts  required to operate a physical distribution system over a reasonably short time horizon.  On the other hand, these time series techniques may not prove to be very accurate. If the  firm has knowledge or insight about future events, such as sales promotions, which can  be expected to dramatically alter the otherwise expected demand, some incorporation of  this knowledge into the forecast through judgmental or relational means is also  appropriate.

Many different time series forecasting procedures have been developed. These  techniques include very simple procedures such as the Moving Average and various  procedures based on the related concept of Exponential Smoothing. Other more complex procedures, such as the Box-Jenkins (ARIMA) Models, are  also available. However, in most cases  these more sophisticated tools have not proven to be superior to the simpler tools,  and so they are not widely used in business.

Read More:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.