The SCP Framework – Structure Conduct Performance Framework

The origin of the SCP (Structure-Conduct-Performance)  paradigm can be traced to the work of the Harvard economist Edward Mason in the 1930s. It was  popularized during 1930-60 with its empirical work involving the identification of correlations between industry structure and performance. This is a paradigm that is foundational to  industrial organization  economics, consistent with the  positional  view of strategy, as opposed to the  resource-based  view of strategy.  There are two competing hypotheses in the SCP paradigm: the traditional  “structure performance hypothesis” and “efficient structure hypothesis”. The structure  performance hypothesis states that the degree of market concentration is inversely related  to the degree of competition. This is because market concentration encourages firms to  collude.  The efficiency structure hypothesis states that performance of the firm is  positively related to its efficiency. This is because market concentration emerges from  competition where firms with low cost structure increase profits by reducing prices and  expanding market share.

The SCP Framework - Structure Conduct Performance Framework

According to the SCP framework (Structure-Conduct-Performance), an industry’s performance (the success of an industry in producing benefits for the consumer) depends on the conduct of its firm, which then depends on the structure (factors that determine the competitiveness of the market). The structure of the industry then depends on basic conditions, such as technology and demand for a product. For example, in an industry with technology such that the average cost of production falls as  output  increases, the industry tends to have one firm, or possibly a small number of firms.

  1. Structure – which refers to market structure. The variables that are used to  describe market structure includes seller concentration, degree of product  differentiation, number and size of competitors  and barriers of entry.
  2. Conduct – which refers to a firm’s behavior. The variables used to capture firm  behavior include pricing strategies, collusion, advertising, research and  development and capacity investment. Some have interpreted conduct as whether  firms collude or compete.
  3. Performance – which refers to outcome or equilibrium assessed in terms of  allocative efficiency. The variables mostly used to measure performance are  profitability and price-cost margin. Performance part in the SCP framework  has two meanings: the performance of individual firms and the performance of the economy as a whole.

According to the logic of the SCP framework, market concentration reduces cost of collusion between firms and produces hyper normal profits. The less there are firms on the  market (concentrated structure); the less competitive is the firm’s behavior (price levels are elevated and/or weak output). Simply put, the fundamental idea of the SCP approach is that, the structure of the industry determines behavior (conduct) and influences performance of the industry.

The SCP framework assumes that market structures identified by many firms providing the same products and services, though relatively equal in firm size, are competitive markets generating greater performance.

In its simplest form, the SCP framework views market structure as exogenous, in the sense that it is the structural characteristics of markets that tend to influence or dictate both the conduct and, ultimately the performance of businesses.

One criticism of the SCP framework is that, it is obviously quite deterministic and linear. Structure is the exogenous (explanatory) variable, everything else is dependent of that. In reality, structure itself is probably also affected by firms’ conduct.

Strategists have turned the traditional objectives of the SCP framework upside down. Instead of seeking ways to increase the competitiveness of industries, strategists have used the SCP framework as a way to describe the attributes of an industry that make it less than perfectly competitive, and thus help firms find ways to obtain competitive advantages.

External Links:

  • Enduring Ideas: The SCP Framework  (McKinsey & Company)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.